Then there’s the genetics research and studies around that
swirl about in people’s peripheries and remain there until they become
relevant. Like the likelihood of a younger sibling being diagnosed with autism.
The dilemma of a second child had weighed heavy on me and my
wife. Not so much setting the weather of our well-being, but certainly
unbalancing it somewhat. Pretty much from the day Isaac was born.Isaac’s birth was barbaric. After a lifetime in labour, the doctors, brandishing ghoulish looking implements, set about extrapolating our distressed boy. Prodding, plunging, pulling. At one stage, the doctor was yanking at an instrument suctioned to my boy’s head in the manner of dislodging a particularly stubborn cork from a bottle of wine. With such force that his temples were throbbing, arms’ shaking, and veins pumping. Eventually, Isaac was dragged out of my poor, poor wife, resembling a bewildered creature washed up from sea.
I’m not aware of any conclusive research linking traumatic
births with autism. Anyway, it’s not somewhere I can psychologically afford to
go.
My wife talks of numbness and delayed shock. Of horrific
memories. That, in some sort of perfect storm of parental crisis, surfaced
violently and vividly at exactly the time Isaac started missing developmental
cues. Whilst other mothers talked of amazing times, emerging from the first
year with a fabulously alert and exploring child, Isaac seemed stuck. As well
as being beaten by his behaviour and full of anxiety, my wife somewhat cruelly
was given the added burden of terrible birth memories. Being selfish and ashamedly self-pitying, I felt practically punished by being around family and friends jollily procreating at a rate of knots. Defensive and depressed, comments like ‘Isaac would benefit from a sibling’ cut through me. I felt sorry for myself, my wife and Isaac. My wife had more humility. But perhaps felt it more personally. A sense of failure swamped her. We were in a rotten place if truth be told. We had a distressed, delayed child who was disrupting our lives, if not to breaking point, then not far off. Did not having a second highlight our pragmatism or shine a harsh light on our inability to cope with parenthood?
And then at diagnosis, the second child issue got a little
more complex. As sensitively handled as possible, the paediatrician’s parting
shot was to tell us that if we had another child he or she would be 5% more likely
to have autism. Unlikely, but still (kind of) significantly more likely than
the standard one in 100 that Isaac had become. Now there was a whole new
imponderable – another child might have autism.
Yet I don’t actually recall us dwelling on this in the days,
weeks, and months after diagnosis. Perhaps autism had liberated us from the
corrosive second child obsessing. It certainly ceased the questioning of our
parenting abilities. What we were unified on was a steadfast focus on Isaac’s
welfare. To embrace the condition; to fight for him; to make up for his
troubled first years. And in doing so, we’d become a confident ‘one child’
family. Proud to say it to people. Solely concentrating on Isaac was the
sensible thing to do. It sapped all our energy and time. It was best for us,
and best for him.
That was the case for the best part of 18 months. It started
to dawn on me though that I’d perhaps mis-read – or not read – my wife on the
issue. Yes, I believed autism allowed her to dial down the intensity of
desiring a second child. Yes, I witnessed her brilliance with Isaac and love
for him, making a mockery of any mothering doubts she’d possessed. Yes, she had
confronted Isaac’s birth and was dealing with the demons.
Yet I don’t actually recall us dwelling on this in the days,
weeks, and months after diagnosis. Perhaps autism had liberated us from the
corrosive second child obsessing. It certainly ceased the questioning of our
parenting abilities. What we were unified on was a steadfast focus on Isaac’s
welfare. To embrace the condition; to fight for him; to make up for his
troubled first years. And in doing so, we’d become a confident ‘one child’
family. Proud to say it to people. Solely concentrating on Isaac was the
sensible thing to do. It sapped all our energy and time. It was best for us,
and best for him. But behind our professing peace with having one child, had she really let go? Somehow I had assumed that, like me, she had. The risk of another child with autism was too great. Surely she agreed?
Confronting it not out of the blue, but certainly unexpectedly, I think I’d got things a little wrong. She welcomed the conversation. All conversation in fact. Indeed, back to that torrent of autism truths, one that’s particularly torrid is how many parents of children with autism split up. 7 out of ten. I by no means feel threatened by that, but it’s a useful tool to remind myself that where autism is concerned, transparent and honest discussion is encouraged at all times.
My concerns were now all centred on the not so solid stat
(some say higher, others lower) of likelihood of autism in a sibling. She
countered me at every turn.
Autism is a spectrum. Children with autism are as individual
from each other as children without it are. So if a sibling does have autism,
he or she will be different from Isaac.
Indeed, Isaac, as my wife puts it, now comes with his own
instruction manual. We know how to handle him, what pushes his buttons, makes
him happy, sad, calm, whatever. That manual won’t be applicable if we were to
have another child with autism; it definitely won’t if we have a child without.
What about the stress of seeking signs that a sibling would
have autism? Yes, she agreed, that would be something to watch for. But it’s
totally and utterly out of our control and the likelihood is incredibly low.
Remain strong. If something is out of sorts, seek help. So much strain with
Isaac was because we didn’t know. Should these challenges repeat themselves
with another, we will be equipped to a certain degree.
Seemingly swiftly, but actually deliberately and
methodically, she had confronted the second child issues, the probabilities and
problems, and emerged confident and content.
I was flummoxed. If she could accept the risk, I surely
could too. What was stopping us?Isaac knows there’s a baby in mummy’s tummy. He processed the information early on. Processed as opposed to comprehended. Even with the baby weeks away, what he really understands I’m not sure. However, his loving, caring behaviour with a baby nephew is reassuring.
The baby’s called Paul Isaac tells us, even though it’s a
girl. A girl is statistically less likely to have autism, but more likely to be
underdiagnosed. More information that is baffling and not enormously helpful.
I worry that when the baby cries Isaac will be upset because
that’s how his mind works. I don’t fear jealousy or vying for attention though
because that’s not really in his nature.
What I do know is that as a unit we are prepared as well as
we can be. Which means, above and beyond, sticking to the rigid routine for
Isaac and not swaying from it. Now, when the baby’s born, and beyond. To always
appreciate his autism, so he and we can cope.
Maybe that’s what enabled us to eventually entertain the
possibility of a second child. An awareness of Isaac’s autism not a fear of a
sibling having it.





